Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • Jan. 1, 1795
  • Page 58
  • PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS.
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, Jan. 1, 1795: Page 58

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, Jan. 1, 1795
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. ← Page 8 of 10 →
Page 58

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Parliamentary Proceedings.

« 3 ?„ L \? w f ^ Sivm M"s a " re P tIle , atc act for sus * pending the Habeas Corpus act . " A long debate then took place , in which several Members spoke on each side itieqncsuon , and » , icl , lasted till ( hrce o ' clock in the morning when tl . eHouse divided , lor the motion 41 , against 185 . rim ; " * £ ommi } te * f Supply , voted . 00 , 000 seamen , including 15 , 000 marines lor the service of the year 795 at the rate of month

, , 4 I . per man per . fortVe ^ T ° '' ^ - " d MC ; '" ' " ° ^ «« pound ibr Land-tax iortnejeai 1 ; also a continuation of the Malt duties Mr . Lnmbton moved for a return of all the foreign troops in British pav and ^ I " co ' ^ l T t ° had ^ " ki"e ( I ° r tlie ^ am ° » S "e t « oS £ * to 11 , 1 =, country by tne Elector of Hanover , the Landgrave of Hesse Cassel the Margrave of Badenand the Land ofDarmstadt

, grave - . He thought his mo ! tion necessary , because he had been informed that this country gave 30 ! for every man belong . ng to these powers , who was either killed or had died ; Md Mr «; 1 . f y bcen . ! » the 'W "f w » " . - ch amounted to 160 000 -nw \» J . ? ' - "" objection to grant the papers moved for . With re-Ss nfm- ^ cd n ' ^ * "' "" f <> 1 ' e I , 6 '' 7 man killed ' tile Honourable Gentleman w « T le motio ' p , 1 ^/ 1 «»» y wrong in the sum which he had calculated . ifie motion was canned unanimously

* taBri " ish w ^ l , !^ '' T ' "' . «« W"ed , wounded , and missing , of M , rt / , '' , S ' ' ' P 'S - -The motion was carried . PrussVm troonseT ' , ' , '" ere be ' aid before tl , e House > lhe a ^»» ' of the Prussian tioops employed , in pursuance of the late treaty as far as tint info ,-mation could be obtained , which was negatived ^ Mr . , SW «« -condemned in the strongest terms the conduct of ministers in V ? SC Itorm ? i ° ? correspondence

7 € r' ; n , ! . ,, . ° as they were in posses 0 , 0 . Ihe House . hen resolved itself into a Committee of Supply and the question being put , that there be granted to his Majesty , oo , iio selen inchu ! Dia ^ T ; ' ' fr- r '; ce o { the ? ear ' w » - RO "' - " *"" ™ "" »; - 5 * , h , m P « V . of the navy . Our ships did not sai so fast as those 01 the enemy ; and there was an inequality in their sail ! ,,- which r iised

Capt . Berkeley thought it incumbent on him , as a naval officer to -av some flung to what had dropped from the Honourable Gent em ; u He " irleed I , u some of our ships didnotsail so well as others ^« o . fl . ' . tit , ^ boS * former " M t ! ' " T ^ ?¦ "' r ^ did our sl" > " ° w sail ' — ' " - "'« Jormeilt . ad done . A question of this sort ought not to betaken no at this period , "iivien we were eivr- . lged in a war . He would confess > . t . might be better sailers than they are , if men of science S i I * end the construction of them if rewards

; Wer , held out fo , I c best models - and he believed the models of the French shi ps were better than ours b t U had better heads and hands , and our ships were inade strong , He be ! ri ^^ CSr' thiltWe SU 0 UW hwc * ' ' * ^ . ether better , 4 n Mr . Robinson replied . of ^! z ;^ : x : ^ i ^ why "eM - " ^ ^ , ^ 1 , lime

Admiral Gardner said , that the Lords of the Admiralty had no < hip « fo do SSsHl " Nit II ^ iT' ? " ° . . pS ; tllat ™^ business of rte Su vcvii of « e Navy He d ftered in op . mon with his Honourable Friend , who had said tint "as « FHH # r' * S

SKSwM II } _ > ' F , ' |) ca ^ <> 3 F ™ m the * French 352 . He entertainer « ] n . o doubt , but if premiums . re hfjd out here for good models , our ships would

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1795-01-01, Page 58” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 25 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01011795/page/58/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
Untitled Article 3
LONDON : Article 3
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 4
PRICES OF BINDING PER VOLUME. Article 4
THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE, OR GENERAL AND COMPLETE LIBRARY. Article 5
AN EXTRAORDINARY TRAVELLER. Article 11
ON THE ADVANTAGES TO BE DERIVED FROM THE STUDY OF THE MATHEMATICS. Article 12
CHURCH PREFERMENT. Article 17
THE FREEMASON. No. I. Article 19
STATE OF FREEMASONRY IN THE COUNTY OF LINCOLN. Article 21
TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE. Article 22
SEA-FIGHT OFF CAPE LA HOGUE, A. D. 1692. Article 22
THE BATTLE OF THE BOYNE. Article 27
ON CONJUGAL INFIDELITY. Article 34
ON THE FALSE LEARNING OF THE PRESENT AGE. Article 37
MR. TASKER'S LETTERS Article 42
THE TRUE SOURCES OF EARTHLY HAPPINESS. AN EASTERN TALE. Article 44
THE CHARACTER OF A GOOD HUSBAND, AND A GOOD WIFE. Article 46
A GOOD WIFE. Article 46
THE ILLUMINATED. Article 47
BROTHER GEORGE WASHINGTON, Article 48
ANSWER TO THE GRAND LODGE OF THE FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS OF MASSACHUSETTS. Article 49
ON THE VICE OF SWEARING. Article 49
PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. Article 51
STRICTURES ON PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 61
POETRY. Article 63
A FAVOURITE MASONIC SONG, Article 64
SIR PHILIP SIDNEY'S EPITAPH. Article 64
PROLOGUE TO THE PLAY OF KNOW YOUR OWN MIND, Article 65
EPIGRAM. Article 65
LINES TO THOMSON, THE IMMORTAL POET OF THE SEASONS. Article 66
EPIGRAM. Article 66
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 67
Untitled Article 75
LONDON : Article 75
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 76
PRICES OF BINDING PER VOLUME. Article 76
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

3 Articles
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

2 Articles
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

2 Articles
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

3 Articles
Page 47

Page 47

2 Articles
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

2 Articles
Page 50

Page 50

1 Article
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

2 Articles
Page 64

Page 64

2 Articles
Page 65

Page 65

2 Articles
Page 66

Page 66

2 Articles
Page 67

Page 67

1 Article
Page 68

Page 68

1 Article
Page 69

Page 69

1 Article
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

1 Article
Page 74

Page 74

1 Article
Page 75

Page 75

2 Articles
Page 76

Page 76

2 Articles
Page 58

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Parliamentary Proceedings.

« 3 ?„ L \? w f ^ Sivm M"s a " re P tIle , atc act for sus * pending the Habeas Corpus act . " A long debate then took place , in which several Members spoke on each side itieqncsuon , and » , icl , lasted till ( hrce o ' clock in the morning when tl . eHouse divided , lor the motion 41 , against 185 . rim ; " * £ ommi } te * f Supply , voted . 00 , 000 seamen , including 15 , 000 marines lor the service of the year 795 at the rate of month

, , 4 I . per man per . fortVe ^ T ° '' ^ - " d MC ; '" ' " ° ^ «« pound ibr Land-tax iortnejeai 1 ; also a continuation of the Malt duties Mr . Lnmbton moved for a return of all the foreign troops in British pav and ^ I " co ' ^ l T t ° had ^ " ki"e ( I ° r tlie ^ am ° » S "e t « oS £ * to 11 , 1 =, country by tne Elector of Hanover , the Landgrave of Hesse Cassel the Margrave of Badenand the Land ofDarmstadt

, grave - . He thought his mo ! tion necessary , because he had been informed that this country gave 30 ! for every man belong . ng to these powers , who was either killed or had died ; Md Mr «; 1 . f y bcen . ! » the 'W "f w » " . - ch amounted to 160 000 -nw \» J . ? ' - "" objection to grant the papers moved for . With re-Ss nfm- ^ cd n ' ^ * "' "" f <> 1 ' e I , 6 '' 7 man killed ' tile Honourable Gentleman w « T le motio ' p , 1 ^/ 1 «»» y wrong in the sum which he had calculated . ifie motion was canned unanimously

* taBri " ish w ^ l , !^ '' T ' "' . «« W"ed , wounded , and missing , of M , rt / , '' , S ' ' ' P 'S - -The motion was carried . PrussVm troonseT ' , ' , '" ere be ' aid before tl , e House > lhe a ^»» ' of the Prussian tioops employed , in pursuance of the late treaty as far as tint info ,-mation could be obtained , which was negatived ^ Mr . , SW «« -condemned in the strongest terms the conduct of ministers in V ? SC Itorm ? i ° ? correspondence

7 € r' ; n , ! . ,, . ° as they were in posses 0 , 0 . Ihe House . hen resolved itself into a Committee of Supply and the question being put , that there be granted to his Majesty , oo , iio selen inchu ! Dia ^ T ; ' ' fr- r '; ce o { the ? ear ' w » - RO "' - " *"" ™ "" »; - 5 * , h , m P « V . of the navy . Our ships did not sai so fast as those 01 the enemy ; and there was an inequality in their sail ! ,,- which r iised

Capt . Berkeley thought it incumbent on him , as a naval officer to -av some flung to what had dropped from the Honourable Gent em ; u He " irleed I , u some of our ships didnotsail so well as others ^« o . fl . ' . tit , ^ boS * former " M t ! ' " T ^ ?¦ "' r ^ did our sl" > " ° w sail ' — ' " - "'« Jormeilt . ad done . A question of this sort ought not to betaken no at this period , "iivien we were eivr- . lged in a war . He would confess > . t . might be better sailers than they are , if men of science S i I * end the construction of them if rewards

; Wer , held out fo , I c best models - and he believed the models of the French shi ps were better than ours b t U had better heads and hands , and our ships were inade strong , He be ! ri ^^ CSr' thiltWe SU 0 UW hwc * ' ' * ^ . ether better , 4 n Mr . Robinson replied . of ^! z ;^ : x : ^ i ^ why "eM - " ^ ^ , ^ 1 , lime

Admiral Gardner said , that the Lords of the Admiralty had no < hip « fo do SSsHl " Nit II ^ iT' ? " ° . . pS ; tllat ™^ business of rte Su vcvii of « e Navy He d ftered in op . mon with his Honourable Friend , who had said tint "as « FHH # r' * S

SKSwM II } _ > ' F , ' |) ca ^ <> 3 F ™ m the * French 352 . He entertainer « ] n . o doubt , but if premiums . re hfjd out here for good models , our ships would

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 57
  • You're on page58
  • 59
  • 76
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy