Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • March 1, 1798
  • Page 61
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, March 1, 1798: Page 61

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, March 1, 1798
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article IRISH PARLIAMENT. ← Page 2 of 2
Page 61

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Irish Parliament.

offers that daily came forward to him in support of the proposition , he thought it would not be wise to reject it . THE LIBERTY OF THE PRESS . Wednesday , it . Mr . O'Donnell rose , to call the attention of the House to several publications in the two last numbers of the paper called The Press . After stating the mischiefs which that paper produced in the country , and ing the necessity there was for putting it downnot by military forcebut

urg , , bylaw , if any law existed that could eifeft that purpose 5 and if not , that Parliament should enact a law for the purpose ; he concluded by moving , in substance , ' That a Committee be appointed to enquire into the nature and tendency of the publication called The Press , and to report their opinion to the House , ' & c .

Mr . Maxwell thought that the enquiry proposed was too narrow . Me mentioned one instance , the Dublin Evening- Post ; though the productions of that paper were far less culpable than those of the other . Mr . Vandelenr was of opinion , that if any enquiry of this nature were necessary , it should be a general one , and not confined to one particular paper . The Attorney-General said , he should have been guilty of a very culpable omission , if he had suffered the various publications , by which The Press notice

had endeavoured to poison the minds of the people , to pass without . The faft was , that soon after the Press began to be circulated , the printer of it had been prosecuted , was found guilty , and was now in Newgate , suffering under the sentence of the law . Soon alter ,., another person , Mr . O'Connor , appeared as the printer and publisher : he had several times since that period violated the laws , in the manner in which that paper was published ; but , soon after he had entered his name as printer , he withdrew himself from this

countryyand , in consequence , his person is now out of the reach of the law . On the adoption of some means to restrain the enormous licentiousness of the press , he thought the safety of every thing dear to the country depended . Mr . Stanley conceived the best mode of preventing these abominable publications would be to inflict the penalty of whipping , instead of pillory , for seditious publications—for the pillory , at present , when inflifted for this offence , was a triumph . He would inflict this , not only on the publisher , but

on every one who should hawk or circulate a seditious paper . Mr . Pelham was glad the enquiry was to be made general , for he would be unwilling to see the House committed " with The Press singly , if there were other prints guilty in the same way .

Mr . O'Donnell moved fir a Committee to enquire , generally , whether any , and what seditious produitions , had been published , & c . & c . _ and report their opinion . —It was carried , with the single negative of Mr . Tighe . Saturday , 24 . Mr . O'Donnell reported from the Sele-St Committee appointed to enquire into the nature aud tendency of certain seditious prints . The resolutions of the Committee were , < That it is their opinion that various publications , of an inflammatory ,

treasonable , and seditious nature , had been for some time past printed and distributed in various parts of this kingdom , and especially in Dublin , with a direct design and tendency to promote insurrection . ' TJias it is their opinion , that ic is necessary that a Bill should be brought into Parliament for the purpose of explaining and amending the act of the 23 d and 24 th of the King for securing the liberty of the press , by preventing the abuses arising from the publication of traitorous , seditious , false and

scandalous libels , by persons unknown . ' _ The Attorney-General moved for leave to bring in a Bill pursuant to the last resolution . Ordered . [ TO BE CONTINUED . }

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1798-03-01, Page 61” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 25 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01031798/page/61/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
TO CORRESPONDENTS, &c. Article 3
PRICES OF BINDING PER VOLUME. Article 3
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUTCHESS OF CUMBERLAND. Article 4
THE LIFE OF XIMENES, ARCHBISHOP OF TOLEDO. Article 5
BRIEF HISTORY OF NONSENSE. Article 11
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF GENERAL MUSKIEN. Article 13
ACCOUNT OF THE CABALISTICAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE JEWS. Article 14
WISDOM AND FOLLY. A VISION. Article 18
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ANCIENTS AND MODERNS IN SCIENCE AND LITERATURE. Article 22
AN HISTORICAL ESSAY ON LONGEVITY. Article 29
AN ESSAY ON THE CHINESE POETRY. Article 31
CHARACTER OF SIR WILLIAM JONES. Article 34
THE LIFE OF DON BALTHASAR OROBIO, Article 36
THE COLLECTOR. Article 38
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 42
GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND. Article 43
REVIEW OF NEW PUBLICATIONS. Article 44
POETRY. Article 52
REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT. Article 56
HOUSE OF COMMONS. Article 56
IRISH PARLIAMENT. Article 60
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 62
OBITUARY. Article 68
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

2 Articles
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

2 Articles
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

2 Articles
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

2 Articles
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

2 Articles
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

1 Article
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

2 Articles
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

1 Article
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

1 Article
Page 67

Page 67

1 Article
Page 68

Page 68

1 Article
Page 69

Page 69

1 Article
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

1 Article
Page 61

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Irish Parliament.

offers that daily came forward to him in support of the proposition , he thought it would not be wise to reject it . THE LIBERTY OF THE PRESS . Wednesday , it . Mr . O'Donnell rose , to call the attention of the House to several publications in the two last numbers of the paper called The Press . After stating the mischiefs which that paper produced in the country , and ing the necessity there was for putting it downnot by military forcebut

urg , , bylaw , if any law existed that could eifeft that purpose 5 and if not , that Parliament should enact a law for the purpose ; he concluded by moving , in substance , ' That a Committee be appointed to enquire into the nature and tendency of the publication called The Press , and to report their opinion to the House , ' & c .

Mr . Maxwell thought that the enquiry proposed was too narrow . Me mentioned one instance , the Dublin Evening- Post ; though the productions of that paper were far less culpable than those of the other . Mr . Vandelenr was of opinion , that if any enquiry of this nature were necessary , it should be a general one , and not confined to one particular paper . The Attorney-General said , he should have been guilty of a very culpable omission , if he had suffered the various publications , by which The Press notice

had endeavoured to poison the minds of the people , to pass without . The faft was , that soon after the Press began to be circulated , the printer of it had been prosecuted , was found guilty , and was now in Newgate , suffering under the sentence of the law . Soon alter ,., another person , Mr . O'Connor , appeared as the printer and publisher : he had several times since that period violated the laws , in the manner in which that paper was published ; but , soon after he had entered his name as printer , he withdrew himself from this

countryyand , in consequence , his person is now out of the reach of the law . On the adoption of some means to restrain the enormous licentiousness of the press , he thought the safety of every thing dear to the country depended . Mr . Stanley conceived the best mode of preventing these abominable publications would be to inflict the penalty of whipping , instead of pillory , for seditious publications—for the pillory , at present , when inflifted for this offence , was a triumph . He would inflict this , not only on the publisher , but

on every one who should hawk or circulate a seditious paper . Mr . Pelham was glad the enquiry was to be made general , for he would be unwilling to see the House committed " with The Press singly , if there were other prints guilty in the same way .

Mr . O'Donnell moved fir a Committee to enquire , generally , whether any , and what seditious produitions , had been published , & c . & c . _ and report their opinion . —It was carried , with the single negative of Mr . Tighe . Saturday , 24 . Mr . O'Donnell reported from the Sele-St Committee appointed to enquire into the nature aud tendency of certain seditious prints . The resolutions of the Committee were , < That it is their opinion that various publications , of an inflammatory ,

treasonable , and seditious nature , had been for some time past printed and distributed in various parts of this kingdom , and especially in Dublin , with a direct design and tendency to promote insurrection . ' TJias it is their opinion , that ic is necessary that a Bill should be brought into Parliament for the purpose of explaining and amending the act of the 23 d and 24 th of the King for securing the liberty of the press , by preventing the abuses arising from the publication of traitorous , seditious , false and

scandalous libels , by persons unknown . ' _ The Attorney-General moved for leave to bring in a Bill pursuant to the last resolution . Ordered . [ TO BE CONTINUED . }

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 60
  • You're on page61
  • 62
  • 73
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy