Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Mirror
  • Oct. 1, 1855
  • Page 23
  • MASONIC INTELLIGENCE.
Current:

The Masonic Mirror, Oct. 1, 1855: Page 23

  • Back to The Masonic Mirror, Oct. 1, 1855
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. ← Page 3 of 4 →
Page 23

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonic Intelligence.

putting them into the hands of the brothers as they entered the room , thereby preventing their exercising a free choice in the election . He considered that a great evil , and he did not see how they wore to get rid of it , except by adopting his resolution , and taking the votes in future by show of hands . Br . the Rev . Dr . Carver seconded the motion , considering that the list system ought to be put an end to . Br . John Hervey agreed Avith the previous speakers , that it was quite time some

better mode of election of the two boards was devised—but he did not consider that the proposal of taking the election by a show of hands would effect the object they had in view . The number of candidates put in nomination for the Board of General Purposes each election , on an average of 8 years , had been 27 , and the number hacl on one occasion , reached as high as 32 . Now he would put it to the meeting , whether they could take thirty-two divisions in one night , and at the . same time transact then- other business . He thought not—aud therefore he must vote against the resolution . It appeared to be thought by some persons , that a benefit was to be obtained by sitting at the Boards ( Cries of No , no ) . He had been a member for 8 years , and with the exception of a great deal of labour , he

hacl never received from his connection with them , move than a glass ot water . As he had said , if any better scheme than that now in existence for conducting the elections could be devised , ho should be happy to support it—but he could not support a change which he did not think would effect an improvement . ( Hear , hear ) . Br . Joseph Smith said it appeared to be the opinion of all , that some change should fake place , and the only difficulty was how to make it . He held that it was not fair that half the brethren should be placed in the position of receiving

lists already marked , and being called upon to vote in accordance with the views of one or two brothers , without knowing why or wherefore . He complained of Grand Officers interfering with the elections as ho had seen done , and he should therefore support the motion of Br . Savage . Br . Tomkius saw . the evils attending the list system , and called on Grand Lodge not to throw out the proposition now before them . Br . Geo . Barrett trusted Grand Lodge would not carry the motion . He

admitted that it would be better if they could do without the lists—but some men traded in Masonry—and canvassed for votes because they hacl assisted others to get a Avarrant for a Chapter , or some thing of that sort . Open voting would give those brothers an xmcVae power OA'er others , and he must therefore oppose the motion .

Br . Herbert Lloyd thought , that if a system was a corrupt one , they ought to endeavour to amend it—but he could not well support the proposition then before them , feeling that it would take up the whole time of Grand Lodge iu elections , and prevent their proceeding with other business . Br . Henry George Warren rose to propose an amendment upon the motion of Br . Savage . He admitted that the present mode of election was not what it ought to be—but at the same time he felt they could not prevent the brethren preparing

lists of candidates for election to the boards , nor did he wish to do so . He thought that they ought , if they saAv fit , be allowed to prepare such lists—but what he complained of was , the sj'stem of one brother standing at the door , intercepting the entrance of the brethren , and putting prepared balloting papers into their hands , and calling upon them to support tho list , the whole list , and nothing but the list . By this practice , brethren frequently never saw who were candidates -until they entered Lodge , ancl then they found the name of one or more of their

friends scratched out , and as a second balloting paper was never issued , they Avere -constrained either to vote in opposition to their friends , or not to A'ote at all . ( Hear , hear ) . His plan he thought both simple and fan-. It would be , to prevent the marking of lists as at present in practice , ancl this he felt could be easily effected . He proposed to take the first part of Br . Savage's resolution , denouncing ¦ the present practice—and in lieu of those words , providing for taking the election by show of hands , to substitute , " it is therefore resolved , that in future no balloting papers shall he issued until after the opening of Grand Lodge—and that during

“The Masonic Mirror: 1855-10-01, Page 23” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 31 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mir/issues/mmg_01101855/page/23/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
UNIFORMITY OF RITUAL. Article 1
FREEMASONRY IN ENGLAND. Article 4
MASONIC REMINISCENCES. Article 11
THE NEW CONSTITUTIONS OF THE FRENCH MASONS. Article 17
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 21
LONDON LODGES. Article 24
PROVINCIAL LODGES. Article 25
ROYAL ARCH. Article 42
SCOTLAND. Article 43
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 50
SUMMARY OF SMEWS FOR SEPTEMBER. Article 53
NOTICES. Article 59
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

2 Articles
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

2 Articles
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

2 Articles
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

2 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

2 Articles
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

2 Articles
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 23

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonic Intelligence.

putting them into the hands of the brothers as they entered the room , thereby preventing their exercising a free choice in the election . He considered that a great evil , and he did not see how they wore to get rid of it , except by adopting his resolution , and taking the votes in future by show of hands . Br . the Rev . Dr . Carver seconded the motion , considering that the list system ought to be put an end to . Br . John Hervey agreed Avith the previous speakers , that it was quite time some

better mode of election of the two boards was devised—but he did not consider that the proposal of taking the election by a show of hands would effect the object they had in view . The number of candidates put in nomination for the Board of General Purposes each election , on an average of 8 years , had been 27 , and the number hacl on one occasion , reached as high as 32 . Now he would put it to the meeting , whether they could take thirty-two divisions in one night , and at the . same time transact then- other business . He thought not—aud therefore he must vote against the resolution . It appeared to be thought by some persons , that a benefit was to be obtained by sitting at the Boards ( Cries of No , no ) . He had been a member for 8 years , and with the exception of a great deal of labour , he

hacl never received from his connection with them , move than a glass ot water . As he had said , if any better scheme than that now in existence for conducting the elections could be devised , ho should be happy to support it—but he could not support a change which he did not think would effect an improvement . ( Hear , hear ) . Br . Joseph Smith said it appeared to be the opinion of all , that some change should fake place , and the only difficulty was how to make it . He held that it was not fair that half the brethren should be placed in the position of receiving

lists already marked , and being called upon to vote in accordance with the views of one or two brothers , without knowing why or wherefore . He complained of Grand Officers interfering with the elections as ho had seen done , and he should therefore support the motion of Br . Savage . Br . Tomkius saw . the evils attending the list system , and called on Grand Lodge not to throw out the proposition now before them . Br . Geo . Barrett trusted Grand Lodge would not carry the motion . He

admitted that it would be better if they could do without the lists—but some men traded in Masonry—and canvassed for votes because they hacl assisted others to get a Avarrant for a Chapter , or some thing of that sort . Open voting would give those brothers an xmcVae power OA'er others , and he must therefore oppose the motion .

Br . Herbert Lloyd thought , that if a system was a corrupt one , they ought to endeavour to amend it—but he could not well support the proposition then before them , feeling that it would take up the whole time of Grand Lodge iu elections , and prevent their proceeding with other business . Br . Henry George Warren rose to propose an amendment upon the motion of Br . Savage . He admitted that the present mode of election was not what it ought to be—but at the same time he felt they could not prevent the brethren preparing

lists of candidates for election to the boards , nor did he wish to do so . He thought that they ought , if they saAv fit , be allowed to prepare such lists—but what he complained of was , the sj'stem of one brother standing at the door , intercepting the entrance of the brethren , and putting prepared balloting papers into their hands , and calling upon them to support tho list , the whole list , and nothing but the list . By this practice , brethren frequently never saw who were candidates -until they entered Lodge , ancl then they found the name of one or more of their

friends scratched out , and as a second balloting paper was never issued , they Avere -constrained either to vote in opposition to their friends , or not to A'ote at all . ( Hear , hear ) . His plan he thought both simple and fan-. It would be , to prevent the marking of lists as at present in practice , ancl this he felt could be easily effected . He proposed to take the first part of Br . Savage's resolution , denouncing ¦ the present practice—and in lieu of those words , providing for taking the election by show of hands , to substitute , " it is therefore resolved , that in future no balloting papers shall he issued until after the opening of Grand Lodge—and that during

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 22
  • You're on page23
  • 24
  • 60
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy