Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Magazine
  • July 1, 1879
  • Page 35
Current:

The Masonic Magazine, July 1, 1879: Page 35

  • Back to The Masonic Magazine, July 1, 1879
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article TRYING TO CHANGE A SOVEREIGN. ← Page 11 of 13 →
Page 35

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Trying To Change A Sovereign.

legislated against by the statute . The restoration judges , however , like the foul sycophants they were , ruled differently : they earned to an extravagant extreme the Mens rea fault return theory , ancl held that a spoken sermon constituted an " overt act " of high treason , not onl y within the recent statute , but semble within that of the Plantagenet monarch , as years afterwards other Stuart Judges held ( ride the leading case of Algernon Sdney ) to the eternal shame of

y , English lawyers , that an unpublished essay—a mere philosophical speculation —found in manuscript in the writer ' s desk , was evidence of " compassing the death of the king . " It took three "big-wigs" to try the Whitechapel spouter . Three king ' s counsel " took up their parable " in three separate speeches against him . He tried ably , but vainly , poor wretch , to point out that the eavesdropping witness was mistaken or perjured , but this was sternly

disallowed as " objecting to the king ' s evidence . " He "humbly conceived ' " that his case was not within " the mischief of the recent statute , " but he was sharply though somewhat illogically , told that this was " impeaching the wisdom of Parliament ancl not to be borne . " Ineffectively he urged that an overt act of treason required to be proved by the evidence of at least two witnesseswhereas here there was but one . " How do you find the prisoner at

, the bar ? " says the clerk of the court as the jury re-enter , and after their names have been re-enumerated— "Guilty or not guilty ? " "Guilty . " " Guilty , and that is the verdict of you all ? " " It is . " " Of what goods and chattels possessed ? " " None to our knowledge . " " Gaoler , look to him , " says the junior judge . Do you know what this meant , reader ? If you have ever had the agony of attending a capital trial yon will have observed that as

the verdict is given , when my lord is fumbling under his desk for the black cap , two stalwart warders start up as if by magic , one on either hand of the convict . They are there ostensibly to support fainting nature , should it give way under that terrible ordeal ; but they , also though now—God be praisedonly traditionally , represent a much more ghastly ceremony formerly " de riguear . " In Scotlandfor instancewhen the terrible word " guilt" was

, , y uttered , the " deempster , " or " doomster , " clad in a close-fitting black doublet ancl hose , upon which was rudely indicated in white the osteology of the human skeleton , used to spring up by the side of the moribund and then ancl there " tie his thumbs I "

In England , Richard Brandon , of Rosemary Lane—ordinary avocation , ragseller ; overtime employment , " supreme executive " or hangman—the fellow who was carried to his loathed grave in Whitechapel churchyard in a coffin ornamented with " hanging ropes in wreaths "—the bonrreau , who was said to have cut off royal Charles ' s head ; in England , at the words " look to him , gaoler , " Brandon , or Squire Don or Dun * ( see your Hudibras ) , or Jack Ketch , would appear as Mr . George Conquest suddenlmakes his avatar through

y a trap door as Trappistino in " Venice , " and incontinentl y , in the presence of the whole court , proceed to pinion his victim . "What are your usual days of execution , Captain Richardson ? " Ermine would enquire of the attendant keeper . " Tuesdays and Fridays , my lord , " would be the read y reply . "Mr . Attorney , " says big-wig , "you can move for judgment to-morrow morning , and we will ive you a rule for Tuesday " or Fridayas the case miht be

g , g , and so poor John James disappears from view , and goes to—to prepare his soul for the great change impending—to make his peace with his Creator—to arrange sadly ancl timorously his mundane affairs ? Nothing of the kind . To wrangle with gaolers and tipstaves and catchpoles , over fees and lodging

“The Masonic Magazine: 1879-07-01, Page 35” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 25 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmg/issues/mmg_01071879/page/35/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
PREFACE. Article 3
CONTENTS. Article 4
ON OLD ENGLISH BIBLES. Article 6
ST. ALBAN'S ABBEY. Article 10
BEATRICE. Article 19
CURIOUS MASONIC JEWELS. Article 22
FREEMASONRY. Article 23
TRYING TO CHANGE A SOVEREIGN. Article 25
THE AGAMEMNON OF AECHYLUS.* Article 38
LIFE OF THE PRINCE CONSORT* Article 42
BROTHER GOULD'S "FOUR OLD LODGES." Article 44
SUMMER. Article 47
FREEMASONRY IN KELSO. Article 47
THE POET. Article 50
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 51
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

2 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

2 Articles
Page 23

Page 23

2 Articles
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

2 Articles
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

2 Articles
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

2 Articles
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

2 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

2 Articles
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 35

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Trying To Change A Sovereign.

legislated against by the statute . The restoration judges , however , like the foul sycophants they were , ruled differently : they earned to an extravagant extreme the Mens rea fault return theory , ancl held that a spoken sermon constituted an " overt act " of high treason , not onl y within the recent statute , but semble within that of the Plantagenet monarch , as years afterwards other Stuart Judges held ( ride the leading case of Algernon Sdney ) to the eternal shame of

y , English lawyers , that an unpublished essay—a mere philosophical speculation —found in manuscript in the writer ' s desk , was evidence of " compassing the death of the king . " It took three "big-wigs" to try the Whitechapel spouter . Three king ' s counsel " took up their parable " in three separate speeches against him . He tried ably , but vainly , poor wretch , to point out that the eavesdropping witness was mistaken or perjured , but this was sternly

disallowed as " objecting to the king ' s evidence . " He "humbly conceived ' " that his case was not within " the mischief of the recent statute , " but he was sharply though somewhat illogically , told that this was " impeaching the wisdom of Parliament ancl not to be borne . " Ineffectively he urged that an overt act of treason required to be proved by the evidence of at least two witnesseswhereas here there was but one . " How do you find the prisoner at

, the bar ? " says the clerk of the court as the jury re-enter , and after their names have been re-enumerated— "Guilty or not guilty ? " "Guilty . " " Guilty , and that is the verdict of you all ? " " It is . " " Of what goods and chattels possessed ? " " None to our knowledge . " " Gaoler , look to him , " says the junior judge . Do you know what this meant , reader ? If you have ever had the agony of attending a capital trial yon will have observed that as

the verdict is given , when my lord is fumbling under his desk for the black cap , two stalwart warders start up as if by magic , one on either hand of the convict . They are there ostensibly to support fainting nature , should it give way under that terrible ordeal ; but they , also though now—God be praisedonly traditionally , represent a much more ghastly ceremony formerly " de riguear . " In Scotlandfor instancewhen the terrible word " guilt" was

, , y uttered , the " deempster , " or " doomster , " clad in a close-fitting black doublet ancl hose , upon which was rudely indicated in white the osteology of the human skeleton , used to spring up by the side of the moribund and then ancl there " tie his thumbs I "

In England , Richard Brandon , of Rosemary Lane—ordinary avocation , ragseller ; overtime employment , " supreme executive " or hangman—the fellow who was carried to his loathed grave in Whitechapel churchyard in a coffin ornamented with " hanging ropes in wreaths "—the bonrreau , who was said to have cut off royal Charles ' s head ; in England , at the words " look to him , gaoler , " Brandon , or Squire Don or Dun * ( see your Hudibras ) , or Jack Ketch , would appear as Mr . George Conquest suddenlmakes his avatar through

y a trap door as Trappistino in " Venice , " and incontinentl y , in the presence of the whole court , proceed to pinion his victim . "What are your usual days of execution , Captain Richardson ? " Ermine would enquire of the attendant keeper . " Tuesdays and Fridays , my lord , " would be the read y reply . "Mr . Attorney , " says big-wig , "you can move for judgment to-morrow morning , and we will ive you a rule for Tuesday " or Fridayas the case miht be

g , g , and so poor John James disappears from view , and goes to—to prepare his soul for the great change impending—to make his peace with his Creator—to arrange sadly ancl timorously his mundane affairs ? Nothing of the kind . To wrangle with gaolers and tipstaves and catchpoles , over fees and lodging

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 34
  • You're on page35
  • 36
  • 53
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy