Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Magazine
  • Sept. 1, 1878
  • Page 3
Current:

The Masonic Magazine, Sept. 1, 1878: Page 3

  • Back to The Masonic Magazine, Sept. 1, 1878
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article FREEMASONRY. ← Page 2 of 2
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Freemasonry.

the view of internal evidence much may be said in favour of a later arrangement , yet I cannot accept Bro . Fnidel ' s theory , the more so , as the argument be bases on the " Ars Quatuor , " etc ., is clearly a chimera of chimeras . III . The writer of the Eeview has not , I think , quite fully realized what I say about Henry VI . and Chichely . The old story of the Lodge at Canterbury , under Chicbety , has been exploded by the discovery of Molash ' s Eegister among the Tanner MSS . in

the Bodleian , Oxford , where the ori gin of the story is found , ancl is a mistake . IV . The Locke MS . being also abandoned as connected with Henry VI ., the only evidence of his connection with Freemasonry is that lie was given up to " Hermetic Studies . " The Eeviewer has not attended to my distinction of historical and prehisfcorical Grand Masters , as both Henry VIII . and Wolsey are among the latter , not the formercategory .

, V . I also place in that list , Charles I ., Charles IL , and William IH ., the last especially , as we have no evidence whatever ( though often asserted ) of his initiation at Hampton Court Palace . The able writer sees the difference between tho " Ante-Ecvival " aud "Post-Eevival" Grand Masters , but does not sufficiently discriminate between the historic and prehistoric list of the same eminent persons . VI . The Eeviewer concludes with the remark that "Mr . Woodford does not

seem to be acquainted with Wren ' s ' Parentalia , ' at any rate , we do not find that be refers to it in his Cyclopaedia . " But the truth is , that for our purposes the ' . . ' Parentalia" is less than no authority . It professes to give an account of Masons and Masonry by a non-Mason , which was held partly to have the authority of Sir Christopher Wren , but really has none of his . Such as it is , it rests on the greater authority of Sir William Dugdale , who in all probability hit the mark when he stated that the original guilds of Masons worked under letters ' and charters of the Pope . The Glasgow Charter ancUhe Confraternity of Lucy , Bishop of AVinchester , and the "illos arte approbates" of William of Wykeham ' s all refer to the same Confraternities . No doubt there is

a certain amount of accuracy in the account of the " Parentalia , " which , as I said before , is in all probability founded simply on Dugdale ' s statement , but yet it cannot be altogether relied upon . _ So far as we have been able to detect the existence and proceedings of the Masonic Guilds , after the lapse of centuries , aud from the dimness of any contemporary or nearly contemporary accounts , they were attached to monasteries ancl directed by the Ecclesiastics . Findel is probably correct when he ascribes to monastic

supervision ancl organization the early proceedings of the German " Bauhiitton , " and in this respect , what was good of Germany was good of England , ancl France , and Italy . Kb doubt our old traditions point to Eoyal immunities ancl special charters , ancl the earliest evidence of the French operative guilds alludes ( like as in our Anglican guild legends ) to prerogatives ancl immunities conceded by King Charles Martel . But still , on the wholethe evidence preponderates as to au oriinal ecclesiastical connection and control .

, g As regards Sir Christopher Wren , his connection with Masonry is still in obscurity . The earlier statements place him hi gh in office in 1 G 63 . Aubrey gives the contemporary date of his initiation as 1691 , and the very fact of his Grand Mastership rests on no known historical evidence , —simply tradition . The Lodge of Antiquity possesses the "Mallet " and Candlesticks presented ( ut dicitur ) to the Lodge , ancl his portrait but as the records of the Lodof Antiquit not yet searched through

; ge y are , it is impossible to say what is the earl y history of that most ancient Lodge . And here stop to-day . I must once more express my hope and belief that this courteous and lucid Eeview of the Pall Mall Gazette of "Kenning ' s Cyclopaedia" and this non-masonic recognition of its merits , as a carefully prepared work , may be a new era in the history of Masonic criticism and investigation .

“The Masonic Magazine: 1878-09-01, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 11 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmg/issues/mmg_01091878/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Monthly Masonic Summary. Article 1
FREEMASONRY. Article 2
THOUGHTS "FOR THE GOOD OF FREEMASONRY." Article 4
ORATION ON FREEMASONRY, ITS MYSTERY AND HISTORY, WHAT IT IS AND WHAT IT IS NOT. Article 6
SONNET. Article 9
THE YEARS AND MASONRY. Article 9
ON LAYING THE CORNER-STONE. Article 10
BEATRICE. Article 11
CLEOPATRA'S NEEDLE. Article 13
FROM PORTLAND TO BANTRY BAY IN ONE OF HER MAJESTY'S IRONCLADS. Article 15
HAVE COURAGE TO SAY NO. Article 18
ART-JOTTINGS IN ART-STUDIOS. Article 19
MILDRED: AN AUTUMN ROMANCE. Article 22
ENTERTAINING HER BIG SISTER'S BEAU. Article 24
LOST AND SAVED ; OR, NELLIE POWERS, THE MISSIONARY'S DAUGHTER. Article 25
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 29
THE INTERNATIONAL MASONIC GATHERING. Article 32
REVIEWS. Article 44
"SPRING FLOWERS AND THE POETS."* Article 47
MY HAND-IN-HAND COMPANION. Article 48
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

2 Articles
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

2 Articles
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

2 Articles
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

2 Articles
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Freemasonry.

the view of internal evidence much may be said in favour of a later arrangement , yet I cannot accept Bro . Fnidel ' s theory , the more so , as the argument be bases on the " Ars Quatuor , " etc ., is clearly a chimera of chimeras . III . The writer of the Eeview has not , I think , quite fully realized what I say about Henry VI . and Chichely . The old story of the Lodge at Canterbury , under Chicbety , has been exploded by the discovery of Molash ' s Eegister among the Tanner MSS . in

the Bodleian , Oxford , where the ori gin of the story is found , ancl is a mistake . IV . The Locke MS . being also abandoned as connected with Henry VI ., the only evidence of his connection with Freemasonry is that lie was given up to " Hermetic Studies . " The Eeviewer has not attended to my distinction of historical and prehisfcorical Grand Masters , as both Henry VIII . and Wolsey are among the latter , not the formercategory .

, V . I also place in that list , Charles I ., Charles IL , and William IH ., the last especially , as we have no evidence whatever ( though often asserted ) of his initiation at Hampton Court Palace . The able writer sees the difference between tho " Ante-Ecvival " aud "Post-Eevival" Grand Masters , but does not sufficiently discriminate between the historic and prehistoric list of the same eminent persons . VI . The Eeviewer concludes with the remark that "Mr . Woodford does not

seem to be acquainted with Wren ' s ' Parentalia , ' at any rate , we do not find that be refers to it in his Cyclopaedia . " But the truth is , that for our purposes the ' . . ' Parentalia" is less than no authority . It professes to give an account of Masons and Masonry by a non-Mason , which was held partly to have the authority of Sir Christopher Wren , but really has none of his . Such as it is , it rests on the greater authority of Sir William Dugdale , who in all probability hit the mark when he stated that the original guilds of Masons worked under letters ' and charters of the Pope . The Glasgow Charter ancUhe Confraternity of Lucy , Bishop of AVinchester , and the "illos arte approbates" of William of Wykeham ' s all refer to the same Confraternities . No doubt there is

a certain amount of accuracy in the account of the " Parentalia , " which , as I said before , is in all probability founded simply on Dugdale ' s statement , but yet it cannot be altogether relied upon . _ So far as we have been able to detect the existence and proceedings of the Masonic Guilds , after the lapse of centuries , aud from the dimness of any contemporary or nearly contemporary accounts , they were attached to monasteries ancl directed by the Ecclesiastics . Findel is probably correct when he ascribes to monastic

supervision ancl organization the early proceedings of the German " Bauhiitton , " and in this respect , what was good of Germany was good of England , ancl France , and Italy . Kb doubt our old traditions point to Eoyal immunities ancl special charters , ancl the earliest evidence of the French operative guilds alludes ( like as in our Anglican guild legends ) to prerogatives ancl immunities conceded by King Charles Martel . But still , on the wholethe evidence preponderates as to au oriinal ecclesiastical connection and control .

, g As regards Sir Christopher Wren , his connection with Masonry is still in obscurity . The earlier statements place him hi gh in office in 1 G 63 . Aubrey gives the contemporary date of his initiation as 1691 , and the very fact of his Grand Mastership rests on no known historical evidence , —simply tradition . The Lodge of Antiquity possesses the "Mallet " and Candlesticks presented ( ut dicitur ) to the Lodge , ancl his portrait but as the records of the Lodof Antiquit not yet searched through

; ge y are , it is impossible to say what is the earl y history of that most ancient Lodge . And here stop to-day . I must once more express my hope and belief that this courteous and lucid Eeview of the Pall Mall Gazette of "Kenning ' s Cyclopaedia" and this non-masonic recognition of its merits , as a carefully prepared work , may be a new era in the history of Masonic criticism and investigation .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 48
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy