Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Magazine
  • Oct. 1, 1878
  • Page 42
Current:

The Masonic Magazine, Oct. 1, 1878: Page 42

  • Back to The Masonic Magazine, Oct. 1, 1878
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE MODERN ORDER OF "KNIGHTS TEMPLAR" IN THE BRITISH DOMINIONS. ← Page 5 of 8 →
Page 42

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Modern Order Of "Knights Templar" In The British Dominions.

generally entertained ; it arose from the changes that have taken place from time to time since the introduction of the Order into English Freemasonry , and we find by reference to Masonic records that it was first conferred as au honorary degree , given either before or after the Royal Arch , evidently with a very short ceremony , mention being made of the recipient receiving other degrees at the same meeting . Unfortunately , the Masonic teachers and writers of the last century fell into very

grave mistakes as to the practices and history of . the old Knightly fraternities , possibly arising from there being at the time no popular historic knowledge of these Orders disseminated , leading them to invent as their fancy dictated what they supposed were the correct usages , without much regard to historic accuracy . Their idea would seem to have been that the Order of Knights Templar and Knights of Malta were synonymous . No doubt this blunder caused the degree of Malta to be mixed up with that of the

Templars , ivhich there is every reason to think was never contemplated when Templary was first attached to the Craft ; but as the Union , whether by design or accident , has been so long established , it is not now desirable nor advisable to dissolve it , the history and doctrines of the Orders being so much alike and the object of both being to attain the same end . In the earlEncampmentsas these combined bodies were calledthe ceremonies

y , , were not of a very uniform character , and considerable differences existed , some referring more to the Hospitallers of St . John , wearing the black habit or costume of that Order , whilst others followed the French " Order du Temple , " representing the Templars of the Crusades , using the white Mantle , the true badge , thus giving rise to the discrepancies

that have been found to exist in different jurisdictions . The degrees of the " Rose Croix " ancl " Kadosh , " now of the A . & A . S . Rite , as also that known as " Kt . Templar Priest , " formed part of the system , to which was added a short ceremony for the Degree of Malta , this latter being merely intended as a brief historical record , to show that the Kts . of St . John , having established themselves iu the Island of Malta , assumed that name , the Masonic Malta Degree being a mere allusion to , but having no inept

pretensions to a connection with the " Sovereign Order of Malta . " Great care appears to have been taken by the Commission to ascertain the aucieut ceremonies of the Templars , evidently from researches into the most authentic documents extant on the subject " , and in preparing a simple and impressive ritual , going back to first principles and keeping it as nearly as possible to what it ivas in the olden time , before Masonic innovations had crept in ivhich had no place in the earlOrder . This explanationit is to

y , be hoped , will prove satisfactory to those interested in the subject whose time aud class of reading may not have led them to a knowledge of its true history , but who wish without trouble to be correctly informed . No arguments or explanation will , however , have any weight where there is a determination not to be convinced , and an obstinacy of purpose to attain a selfish end . A dislike of change is a characteristic of most of us , and we are naturally in favour of what has been sanctioned blong useclinging to old

y , associations ; but the antiquity to be desired and retained is that which carries us back to the beginning ; the working of any new system being most irksome , it is wise to make all radical changes gradually , respecting the prejudices of those who are opposed to extreme measures .

There cannot be a doubt that in modern Templary many customs have been introduced by those ignorant of its history who , taking vulgar error and fiction for fact , have perpetuated absurdities as genuine evidence , which it is now difficult to eradicate , although shown to be historically incorrect . In former times there were two separate classes of Knighthood : the earliest ( non - extinct ) originated with the Crusades , being independent military fraternities , or bodies

of soldier Monks , which the modern Templars represent . The second class , or titular Knighthood , established long afterwards by Royal authority , still survives , ancl is a distinction of high honour , resting in . the hands of Sovereigns , granted for distinguished sendees to the State , to which the title " Sir" or " Chevalier" prefixed to the Christian name is alone applicable . Masonry has no power nor ever had of conferring Knighthood ; the only authority

“The Masonic Magazine: 1878-10-01, Page 42” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 24 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmg/issues/mmg_01101878/page/42/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Monthly Masonic Summary. Article 1
CHARTER OF SCOON AND PERTH LODGE, A.D. 1658. Article 2
THE SO-CALLED LOCKE MS. Article 4
AN OPENING ODE. Article 7
MASONRY AND CHRISTIANITY. Article 8
A SONG FOR SUMMER. Article 9
FIVE POINTS OF FELLOWSHIP. Article 10
BEATRICE. Article 11
ART-JOTTINGS IN ART-STUDIOS.* Article 14
LEND A HELPING HAND. Article 16
AUTUMN LEAFLETS. Article 17
AN IMPROMPTU. Article 19
LORELEI. Article 19
MILDRED: AN AUTUMN ROMANCE. Article 21
A VISIT TO ASHOVER CHURCHYARD. Article 25
LOST AND SAVED; OR, NELLIE POWERS, THE MISSIONARY'S DAUGHTER. Article 28
REVIEW. Article 32
SONNET. Article 34
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 35
THE MODERN ORDER OF "KNIGHTS TEMPLAR" IN THE BRITISH DOMINIONS. Article 38
THE ORIGIN AND REFERENCES OF THE HERMESIAN SPURIOUS FREEMASONRY. Article 46
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

2 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

2 Articles
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

2 Articles
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 42

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Modern Order Of "Knights Templar" In The British Dominions.

generally entertained ; it arose from the changes that have taken place from time to time since the introduction of the Order into English Freemasonry , and we find by reference to Masonic records that it was first conferred as au honorary degree , given either before or after the Royal Arch , evidently with a very short ceremony , mention being made of the recipient receiving other degrees at the same meeting . Unfortunately , the Masonic teachers and writers of the last century fell into very

grave mistakes as to the practices and history of . the old Knightly fraternities , possibly arising from there being at the time no popular historic knowledge of these Orders disseminated , leading them to invent as their fancy dictated what they supposed were the correct usages , without much regard to historic accuracy . Their idea would seem to have been that the Order of Knights Templar and Knights of Malta were synonymous . No doubt this blunder caused the degree of Malta to be mixed up with that of the

Templars , ivhich there is every reason to think was never contemplated when Templary was first attached to the Craft ; but as the Union , whether by design or accident , has been so long established , it is not now desirable nor advisable to dissolve it , the history and doctrines of the Orders being so much alike and the object of both being to attain the same end . In the earlEncampmentsas these combined bodies were calledthe ceremonies

y , , were not of a very uniform character , and considerable differences existed , some referring more to the Hospitallers of St . John , wearing the black habit or costume of that Order , whilst others followed the French " Order du Temple , " representing the Templars of the Crusades , using the white Mantle , the true badge , thus giving rise to the discrepancies

that have been found to exist in different jurisdictions . The degrees of the " Rose Croix " ancl " Kadosh , " now of the A . & A . S . Rite , as also that known as " Kt . Templar Priest , " formed part of the system , to which was added a short ceremony for the Degree of Malta , this latter being merely intended as a brief historical record , to show that the Kts . of St . John , having established themselves iu the Island of Malta , assumed that name , the Masonic Malta Degree being a mere allusion to , but having no inept

pretensions to a connection with the " Sovereign Order of Malta . " Great care appears to have been taken by the Commission to ascertain the aucieut ceremonies of the Templars , evidently from researches into the most authentic documents extant on the subject " , and in preparing a simple and impressive ritual , going back to first principles and keeping it as nearly as possible to what it ivas in the olden time , before Masonic innovations had crept in ivhich had no place in the earlOrder . This explanationit is to

y , be hoped , will prove satisfactory to those interested in the subject whose time aud class of reading may not have led them to a knowledge of its true history , but who wish without trouble to be correctly informed . No arguments or explanation will , however , have any weight where there is a determination not to be convinced , and an obstinacy of purpose to attain a selfish end . A dislike of change is a characteristic of most of us , and we are naturally in favour of what has been sanctioned blong useclinging to old

y , associations ; but the antiquity to be desired and retained is that which carries us back to the beginning ; the working of any new system being most irksome , it is wise to make all radical changes gradually , respecting the prejudices of those who are opposed to extreme measures .

There cannot be a doubt that in modern Templary many customs have been introduced by those ignorant of its history who , taking vulgar error and fiction for fact , have perpetuated absurdities as genuine evidence , which it is now difficult to eradicate , although shown to be historically incorrect . In former times there were two separate classes of Knighthood : the earliest ( non - extinct ) originated with the Crusades , being independent military fraternities , or bodies

of soldier Monks , which the modern Templars represent . The second class , or titular Knighthood , established long afterwards by Royal authority , still survives , ancl is a distinction of high honour , resting in . the hands of Sovereigns , granted for distinguished sendees to the State , to which the title " Sir" or " Chevalier" prefixed to the Christian name is alone applicable . Masonry has no power nor ever had of conferring Knighthood ; the only authority

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 41
  • You're on page42
  • 43
  • 48
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy