Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • June 1, 1861
  • Page 6
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 1, 1861: Page 6

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 1, 1861
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN AND HIS TIMES. ← Page 2 of 3 →
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Sir Christopher Wren And His Times.

remarked , that the church had suffered more than the church man ; and this was why it became necessary to call in tbe surveyor-general by his assessor to inquire carefully into its condition . Dr . Wren reported that he found the nave piers 6 in . or so out of the perpendicular ; that he discovered them to be built of " rubbish stone and much

mortar within , " and a mere shell of ashlar on the face ; that he found the vaulting to be too heavy for its abutments , and to have been always so .- hence the failure of the walls ; ancl that the tower " leaned manifestly" by the settlement of one of its piers . Ho recommended " new flagging" ( that is to say , stone casing ) for the interior ; he advised it to be done " after a good Eoman manner" ( that is to sayin classic

, style ); and he argued that this could be accomplished quite as easily as any restoration of " the Gothic rudeness of the ¦ old design . " Ho proposed , also , to construct a new roof of timber , plastered , or a lighter shell of stone , or of brick and stucco . He lastly suggested ( referring obviously to the example of St . Peter ' s at Eome ) the substitution of a dome and lantern for the ruinous tower , which he pronounced to

be " a heap of deformities . " At the present day , without committing one's self to more than the mere suggestion of a fact , it may be remarked that a report upon a ruinous Gothic cathedral would be conceived in at least a very different spirit . Although , however , the royal patronage of Dr . Wren ivcnt as yet no farther than this call for his advice Old St .

upon Paul ' s , ancl certainly did not go in any degree to carry it into effect , we find in the same year of 1663 , that private commissions began to assume a much more substantial shape . He produced his designs for the Sheklonian Theatre at Oxford ; as also for a now chapel to Pembroke Hall , Cambridge . As regards the latter , his triumphant uncle , the Bishop of Ely , having at thc Lord ' s leisure come forth from

his twenty years' imprisonment , had resolved to appropriate the greater part of his revenues for the benefit of Pembroke Hall ; the new chapel , therefore , was iu fact a commission from him . And it may be noticed that a few years afterwards , when the bishop , at the ripe age of eighty-one , came at length to rest from his labours , it was here that he was buried , and that with all the pomp which the ancient

university could display , in honour of one who had suffered so much in the cause of what he honestly considered to bo Muscular Christianity . Having now fairly embarked in the practice of an architect , Dr . Wren determined to travel ; for the sources of information and means of study at his command , at home were very limited indeed . The Italian treatises and plates

of Alberti , Palladio , and their followers , the few buildings erected by Inigo Jones , and perha-is a stray * drawing from Paris now and then , if not from Italy itself , handed about recently as a marvel , —these were all . Critics of the modern Gothic school will remind me that he hacl the whole range of the fine monuments of Medicnval England , and that the modern spire or steeple , a feature of his own origination , and of his continual use in exquisite variety of

perfection , proves how much he owed to the study of those remains ; but their need be no disguise about the fact that our doctor of classical learning treated Medianval buildings with very much of straightforward disrespect , and would gladly havo put " new flagging " to the best of them , " after a good Eoman manner , " to conceal " the Gothic rudeness of their old design . " Doubtless the contemplation

with so keen an eye for grace and fitness as his , of the picturesque effects of that style of architecture , did much to form his taste : this is now universally admitted ; but whether ho was aware of it is quite another thing . At all events , a natural anxiety to extend his sphere of study in thc art of his choice , led him to resolve upon a journey to Paris—the Paris of Louis XIY . —and to the Italian cities , the head

quarters of modern art , to examine the works of the great masters . In 1665 , then , our young architect ( for he was now but thirty-three ) journeyed to Paris . I dare say it took him more than twelve hours , ancl no doubt he was much more than two hours on tho Channel . He did not sec the Boulevard de Sebastopol , nor the Eue deEivoli , nor the Madeleine , the

nor Pantheon , nor the Louvre of Louis Napoleon , nor the Bois de Boulogne ; but he saw what was worth quite as

much in his day , and was as much delighted as any one of us now to soe Paris for the first time . To give a fair notion of his impressions and of his doings , of the condition of art at that day , and of his own tastes and principles , there is a well-known letter given in tho I'arentalia , from which let me read some extracts .

( The lecturer then read , an account given at pp . 261 , 262 of the Parentaiia , of Wren ' s visit to Paris in 1665 . ) In the spring of next year , Dr . Wren ( as he was still designated ) returned home . His travels had not been pursued beyond Paris . There are some intellects which do not work on the laborious collection of illustrations , but rather on certain abstracted principles , which are more or less

readily but almost unconsciously grasped . I fancy the intellect of Wren was of this stamp . If so , I can easily understand that he deemed the impressions which he had acquired ' in Baris to be enough for his purpose . "When you have seen one green field , " says Dr . Johnson , " you have seen all green fields ; " just so , to certain minds , when they have seen one great citythey have seen all great cities . At all events

, Wren seems to have been satisfied with the sight of Paris ; books , drawings , and his own fancy would do the rest . And . so they did . And , curiously enough , it has been pointed out , in view of the graceful proportions and carefully moulded details of such a building as St . Paul's , that where this great architect repudiates the fripperies of the school of Bernini , and swerves from what was the precedent of his

day , he leans by some inexplicable instinct invariably towards the then unknown manner of the Greeks ; one of the most remarkable instances on record of that natural elegance of conception which in its modest simplicity and subdued power is the ultimate perfection of the highest art . We are now brought in the course of events to the Great Fire of London and the new St . Paul ' s , and the thence uninterrupted routine of the life of an architect .

On his return from Paris , Dr . Wren was desired to report again upon the ancient cathedral of London . Evelyn , whoheld an official post in connection with Government buildings , was associated with him ; also a Mr . Pratt , and a Mr . Chicheley . Wren ' s proposal for extensive re-edification does not seem to have been palpable ; Pratt and Chicheley persistently opposed it , advocating piecemeal repair . The fact

that the vaulting of the nave had spread and thrust out the walls has already been mentioned : when Wren directed attention to this , the reply of his opponents seems singularly apt as a sample of John Bull logic . This receding of the walls , said these authorities , was but a refinement of design , intended to enhance the perspective effect . This was within a few days of the end of August , 1666 . On the 2 nd day of September fate stepped in very unexpectedly and took up the matter . The Great Fire reduced the fabric to a state of wreck .

The city of London was now in great part laid in ashes ; and here there was presented to our young architect , as has been often said , the finest opportunity for the acquisition of fame which has ever been provided for any man in his walk of life ; for I need not remark that it very soon became appai-ent that the public buildings of the new city were to be committed to his charge as a whole . How this happened ,

allowing all that can be claimed for Wren ' s transcendant merits , those who look at the case as men of business and men of the world can scarcely yet understand . He appears to have had literally no competitor ; and it seems inexpeicable that no individual whatever should have taken advantage of the opportunity to palm off upon somebody a knowledge of stone masonry and the possession of Palladio as a

certificate of qualification , —make a trip to Paris , for instance , to come home a travelled man ; or , what might have been easily done , journeyed forthwith to Eome and Florence , that he might hold his head even higher than that of little Dr . Wren .

It is worthy of note how rapidly projects for rebuilding London came before tho public . The flames raged from September the 2 nd till the Sth ; on the tenth even the whole area was a field of smouldering ruins . But within two days of this 10 th of September , while clouds of stifling smoke mid mantraps of hidden fire must havo been the staple commodities of the unhappy scene , we find a plan presented to the king by Evelyn , officially , for a new city . Exactly a

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1861-06-01, Page 6” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 14 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_01061861/page/6/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
FREEMASONRY IN FRANCE. Article 1
MEMOIRS OF THE FREEMASONS OF NAPLES. Article 2
Untitled Article 3
LASWARRIE. Article 3
SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN AND HIS TIMES. Article 5
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL INTELLIGENCE. Article 7
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 7
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 9
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 10
IN MEMORIAM—IN FUTURO. Article 10
MASONIC MEMS. Article 11
SUPREME GRAND LODGE. Article 11
METROPOLITAN. Article 13
PROVINCIAL. Article 15
ROYAL ARCH. Article 18
MARK MASONRY. Article 18
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

4 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

3 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Sir Christopher Wren And His Times.

remarked , that the church had suffered more than the church man ; and this was why it became necessary to call in tbe surveyor-general by his assessor to inquire carefully into its condition . Dr . Wren reported that he found the nave piers 6 in . or so out of the perpendicular ; that he discovered them to be built of " rubbish stone and much

mortar within , " and a mere shell of ashlar on the face ; that he found the vaulting to be too heavy for its abutments , and to have been always so .- hence the failure of the walls ; ancl that the tower " leaned manifestly" by the settlement of one of its piers . Ho recommended " new flagging" ( that is to say , stone casing ) for the interior ; he advised it to be done " after a good Eoman manner" ( that is to sayin classic

, style ); and he argued that this could be accomplished quite as easily as any restoration of " the Gothic rudeness of the ¦ old design . " Ho proposed , also , to construct a new roof of timber , plastered , or a lighter shell of stone , or of brick and stucco . He lastly suggested ( referring obviously to the example of St . Peter ' s at Eome ) the substitution of a dome and lantern for the ruinous tower , which he pronounced to

be " a heap of deformities . " At the present day , without committing one's self to more than the mere suggestion of a fact , it may be remarked that a report upon a ruinous Gothic cathedral would be conceived in at least a very different spirit . Although , however , the royal patronage of Dr . Wren ivcnt as yet no farther than this call for his advice Old St .

upon Paul ' s , ancl certainly did not go in any degree to carry it into effect , we find in the same year of 1663 , that private commissions began to assume a much more substantial shape . He produced his designs for the Sheklonian Theatre at Oxford ; as also for a now chapel to Pembroke Hall , Cambridge . As regards the latter , his triumphant uncle , the Bishop of Ely , having at thc Lord ' s leisure come forth from

his twenty years' imprisonment , had resolved to appropriate the greater part of his revenues for the benefit of Pembroke Hall ; the new chapel , therefore , was iu fact a commission from him . And it may be noticed that a few years afterwards , when the bishop , at the ripe age of eighty-one , came at length to rest from his labours , it was here that he was buried , and that with all the pomp which the ancient

university could display , in honour of one who had suffered so much in the cause of what he honestly considered to bo Muscular Christianity . Having now fairly embarked in the practice of an architect , Dr . Wren determined to travel ; for the sources of information and means of study at his command , at home were very limited indeed . The Italian treatises and plates

of Alberti , Palladio , and their followers , the few buildings erected by Inigo Jones , and perha-is a stray * drawing from Paris now and then , if not from Italy itself , handed about recently as a marvel , —these were all . Critics of the modern Gothic school will remind me that he hacl the whole range of the fine monuments of Medicnval England , and that the modern spire or steeple , a feature of his own origination , and of his continual use in exquisite variety of

perfection , proves how much he owed to the study of those remains ; but their need be no disguise about the fact that our doctor of classical learning treated Medianval buildings with very much of straightforward disrespect , and would gladly havo put " new flagging " to the best of them , " after a good Eoman manner , " to conceal " the Gothic rudeness of their old design . " Doubtless the contemplation

with so keen an eye for grace and fitness as his , of the picturesque effects of that style of architecture , did much to form his taste : this is now universally admitted ; but whether ho was aware of it is quite another thing . At all events , a natural anxiety to extend his sphere of study in thc art of his choice , led him to resolve upon a journey to Paris—the Paris of Louis XIY . —and to the Italian cities , the head

quarters of modern art , to examine the works of the great masters . In 1665 , then , our young architect ( for he was now but thirty-three ) journeyed to Paris . I dare say it took him more than twelve hours , ancl no doubt he was much more than two hours on tho Channel . He did not sec the Boulevard de Sebastopol , nor the Eue deEivoli , nor the Madeleine , the

nor Pantheon , nor the Louvre of Louis Napoleon , nor the Bois de Boulogne ; but he saw what was worth quite as

much in his day , and was as much delighted as any one of us now to soe Paris for the first time . To give a fair notion of his impressions and of his doings , of the condition of art at that day , and of his own tastes and principles , there is a well-known letter given in tho I'arentalia , from which let me read some extracts .

( The lecturer then read , an account given at pp . 261 , 262 of the Parentaiia , of Wren ' s visit to Paris in 1665 . ) In the spring of next year , Dr . Wren ( as he was still designated ) returned home . His travels had not been pursued beyond Paris . There are some intellects which do not work on the laborious collection of illustrations , but rather on certain abstracted principles , which are more or less

readily but almost unconsciously grasped . I fancy the intellect of Wren was of this stamp . If so , I can easily understand that he deemed the impressions which he had acquired ' in Baris to be enough for his purpose . "When you have seen one green field , " says Dr . Johnson , " you have seen all green fields ; " just so , to certain minds , when they have seen one great citythey have seen all great cities . At all events

, Wren seems to have been satisfied with the sight of Paris ; books , drawings , and his own fancy would do the rest . And . so they did . And , curiously enough , it has been pointed out , in view of the graceful proportions and carefully moulded details of such a building as St . Paul's , that where this great architect repudiates the fripperies of the school of Bernini , and swerves from what was the precedent of his

day , he leans by some inexplicable instinct invariably towards the then unknown manner of the Greeks ; one of the most remarkable instances on record of that natural elegance of conception which in its modest simplicity and subdued power is the ultimate perfection of the highest art . We are now brought in the course of events to the Great Fire of London and the new St . Paul ' s , and the thence uninterrupted routine of the life of an architect .

On his return from Paris , Dr . Wren was desired to report again upon the ancient cathedral of London . Evelyn , whoheld an official post in connection with Government buildings , was associated with him ; also a Mr . Pratt , and a Mr . Chicheley . Wren ' s proposal for extensive re-edification does not seem to have been palpable ; Pratt and Chicheley persistently opposed it , advocating piecemeal repair . The fact

that the vaulting of the nave had spread and thrust out the walls has already been mentioned : when Wren directed attention to this , the reply of his opponents seems singularly apt as a sample of John Bull logic . This receding of the walls , said these authorities , was but a refinement of design , intended to enhance the perspective effect . This was within a few days of the end of August , 1666 . On the 2 nd day of September fate stepped in very unexpectedly and took up the matter . The Great Fire reduced the fabric to a state of wreck .

The city of London was now in great part laid in ashes ; and here there was presented to our young architect , as has been often said , the finest opportunity for the acquisition of fame which has ever been provided for any man in his walk of life ; for I need not remark that it very soon became appai-ent that the public buildings of the new city were to be committed to his charge as a whole . How this happened ,

allowing all that can be claimed for Wren ' s transcendant merits , those who look at the case as men of business and men of the world can scarcely yet understand . He appears to have had literally no competitor ; and it seems inexpeicable that no individual whatever should have taken advantage of the opportunity to palm off upon somebody a knowledge of stone masonry and the possession of Palladio as a

certificate of qualification , —make a trip to Paris , for instance , to come home a travelled man ; or , what might have been easily done , journeyed forthwith to Eome and Florence , that he might hold his head even higher than that of little Dr . Wren .

It is worthy of note how rapidly projects for rebuilding London came before tho public . The flames raged from September the 2 nd till the Sth ; on the tenth even the whole area was a field of smouldering ruins . But within two days of this 10 th of September , while clouds of stifling smoke mid mantraps of hidden fire must havo been the staple commodities of the unhappy scene , we find a plan presented to the king by Evelyn , officially , for a new city . Exactly a

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 5
  • You're on page6
  • 7
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy