Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • June 20, 1863
  • Page 11
  • YORK FREEMASONS AND FREEMASONS OF YORK.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 20, 1863: Page 11

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 20, 1863
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article UNIFORMITY OF WORKING. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article YORK FREEMASONS AND FREEMASONS OF YORK. Page 1 of 1
Page 11

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Uniformity Of Working.

marks . I candidly confess that there are portions of the ritual which might with advantage be amended , and others which appear to be at variance with the Lectures , but for the reasons mentioned I am opposed to any alterations by individual Masters or officers on their own responsibilitj-, and therefore , in discharging my duties as WM which I h recentlagain enteredendeavour

.., on ave y , to carry out the working I have " been taught from the Instruction Lodge of Unions , notwithstanding that those who have made innovations , in accordance with their own opinions , which I admit are in many cases capable of justification , point out to me the inconsistency of such a course .

The practical deduction to be made from what I have stated is , that some means should be adopted by the Grand Lodge of England to keep a supervision over the proceedings of private lodges , such as the appointment ¦ of authorized visitors of great Masonic knowledge and experience , to periodically attend the meetings , to examine into the system of working in each , as well as into its

condition in other respects , and formally to report thereon to a Board appointed for the purpose . " Especially should this commission require the warrant to be produced , as well as the by-laws , minute-book , and other records . I have in my mind a case now under examination , in which such a requirement would have checked a serious irregularityand probablhave led to its correction before

, y it become impossible in such a manner as is desirable , but which cannot now be effected , owing to lapse of time since the irregularity arose . The necessity for this increases in proportion to the increase in the number of lodges , which has lately been very great , for whereas fifteen years ago the highest number was about 800 , and really there were not so many , because some on the list had ceased to

exist , the highest number is now nearly 1300 . * There is of course a corresponding addition to the pecuniary resources of Grand Lodge , which should provide therefrom for such an expenditure as would attend the course suggested , in order to maintain efficiency and correctness . There can be little doubt that the adoption of a regular and exact supervision would lead to a conviction on the

part of the Masonic authorities of the importance of that uniformity of ritual to which I first alluded ; of the difficulties which stand in the way of the zealous Master even when most anxious to perform his duties satisfactorily and correctly ; of the laxity which exists where the opportunities of obtaining instruction are very limited ; and of the necessity for talcing measures to obtain a similarity

in the mode of working , by fixing upon a standard , in forming which apparent anomalies and errors might be corrected . When once this is adopted , all should be required to conform to it , and any departures from it should be noticed by the Board appointed for the purpose , on receiving a report to that effect from the travelling commissioners . This would moreover furnish a favourable

opportunity for entering into negotiations with the Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland to the same end , Trusting that this communication may lead some of those in London who take an active part in Grand Lodge proceedings to consider the matter , and to take such steps as the } ' may deem expedient , I have the honour to remain , yours fraternally , H . PL , P . M . 51 , W . M . 1260 . Jersey , June 13 th , 1863 .

York Freemasons And Freemasons Of York.

YORK FREEMASONS AND FREEMASONS OF YORK .

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE AND MASONIC MIRROTI . DEAR SIR AND BROTHER . —Every one has heard of the Kentish men and the men of Kent , though but few know the difference , and now wo have anew version of the same in the York Freemasons and the Freemasons of York ; but in this latter case the distinction is obvious , as will be shown presently .

In the last number of THE MAGAZINE , page 47 o , there is an account of the consecration of a new Masonic Hall , in York , and the Rev . Bro . J . E . M . Young , Prov . G . Chap ., in his oration on that occasion , brought prominently before his auditors , claims for the Freemasons of York , to be considered as York Masons—two things as widely differing in reality as they are nearly assimilated in sound .

It is not my business to analyse the evidence which could be brought forward to prove that the so-called charter of Athelstan , which the speaker said was granted in the tenth century , and that there was strong reason to believe was in existence at the beginning of the present century , and might be so yet , is nothing more than one of those fond illusions which frequently haunt

Freemasons , and make them assert many incongruous things which , if not actually false , are at the best . 'but doubtful . Freemasonry is decidedly ancient , but in the absence of documentary proof , legendary accounts of its antiquity can serve no good purpose , and tend rather to bring discredit on its pretensions than to enhance its value . That York oriinallwas the seat of the Grand Lodge

g y of all England there is no denying . That the York rite was that most popularly known wherever Freemasonry was practised , is equally true . But that the present Freemasons of York have any special claim to be ranked as York Freemasons , i . e ., brethren of the York rite , is equally unfounded . Before the revival of Freemasonry in Londonin 1717

, , the York rite was the only known Freemasonry in England , and despite the modern Grand Lodge , it flourished under the name of Ancient Masonry , up to the union in 1813 , when such portions of it as suited the Lodge of Reconciliation , was altered and adapted to our present

system of working , and that poz'fcion which did not please , was solemnly declared not to belong to Craft Masonry , and has been , in accordance with this decision , ignored by our Grand Lodge , and though unconnected with blue Freemasonry , yet flourishes vigorously in this country , totally independent of the Grand Lodge of England . In foreign countries the York rite is Freemasonry per

se . It is regarded as the original form of Freemasonry , and from which England alone , of all nations on the earth , the land in which the York rite first had birth , solemnly repudiated it , as a whole , and formed that poor jargon which we now call our Craft ritual from the more copious , elegant , correct , and interesting ritual of the York rite .

If we trace the history of the Grand Lodge of England , from the Grand Mastership of Bro . Payne , at its revival , down to our present M . W . G . M ., the Earl of Zetland , we shall find that every one who has occupied that exalted position , has been a modern Mason , and to show how unfounded are the claims of the Prov . G . Chaplain of North and East Yorkshireto be " remembered we are a

, York lodge , " or that they " may prove worthy of the name of York Masons ; " it is evidenced by the fact that the M . W . G . M . is , as well as being head of the Craft , the Prov . G . M . of North aud East Yorkshire , and if he is not a York Freemason as the one , he cannot be as the nth Rt \

These remarks are m no way intended to trench upon the collective , or individual , worthiness of the Freemasons of Yorkshire , but are put forward to show that Freemasons who are natives of , or reside in , Yorkshire , are no more York Freemasons , according to the old acceptance of the term , than a man who is born in a stable is a horse .

For the future , let us have as much enquiry as possible , but no assumption founded merely on the ring of words which in the case of Freemasonry proper , mean a distinct rite , and on the other hand a locality . I am , dear Sir and brother , jours fraternally , A YORK CULDEE FREEMASON . London , June 14 th , 1863 .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1863-06-20, Page 11” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 11 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_20061863/page/11/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE FREEMASONS MAGAZINE. Article 1
GEOMETRICAL AND OTHER SYMBOLS. Article 1
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 7
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 8
THE PLANS AND DESIGNS FOR FREEMASONS' HALL. Article 9
UNIFORMITY OF WORKING. Article 10
YORK FREEMASONS AND FREEMASONS OF YORK. Article 11
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 12
METROPOLITAN. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 12
AUSTRALIA. Article 14
MARK MASONRY. Article 16
ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED RITE. Article 17
THE WEEK. Article 17
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

4 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 11

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Uniformity Of Working.

marks . I candidly confess that there are portions of the ritual which might with advantage be amended , and others which appear to be at variance with the Lectures , but for the reasons mentioned I am opposed to any alterations by individual Masters or officers on their own responsibilitj-, and therefore , in discharging my duties as WM which I h recentlagain enteredendeavour

.., on ave y , to carry out the working I have " been taught from the Instruction Lodge of Unions , notwithstanding that those who have made innovations , in accordance with their own opinions , which I admit are in many cases capable of justification , point out to me the inconsistency of such a course .

The practical deduction to be made from what I have stated is , that some means should be adopted by the Grand Lodge of England to keep a supervision over the proceedings of private lodges , such as the appointment ¦ of authorized visitors of great Masonic knowledge and experience , to periodically attend the meetings , to examine into the system of working in each , as well as into its

condition in other respects , and formally to report thereon to a Board appointed for the purpose . " Especially should this commission require the warrant to be produced , as well as the by-laws , minute-book , and other records . I have in my mind a case now under examination , in which such a requirement would have checked a serious irregularityand probablhave led to its correction before

, y it become impossible in such a manner as is desirable , but which cannot now be effected , owing to lapse of time since the irregularity arose . The necessity for this increases in proportion to the increase in the number of lodges , which has lately been very great , for whereas fifteen years ago the highest number was about 800 , and really there were not so many , because some on the list had ceased to

exist , the highest number is now nearly 1300 . * There is of course a corresponding addition to the pecuniary resources of Grand Lodge , which should provide therefrom for such an expenditure as would attend the course suggested , in order to maintain efficiency and correctness . There can be little doubt that the adoption of a regular and exact supervision would lead to a conviction on the

part of the Masonic authorities of the importance of that uniformity of ritual to which I first alluded ; of the difficulties which stand in the way of the zealous Master even when most anxious to perform his duties satisfactorily and correctly ; of the laxity which exists where the opportunities of obtaining instruction are very limited ; and of the necessity for talcing measures to obtain a similarity

in the mode of working , by fixing upon a standard , in forming which apparent anomalies and errors might be corrected . When once this is adopted , all should be required to conform to it , and any departures from it should be noticed by the Board appointed for the purpose , on receiving a report to that effect from the travelling commissioners . This would moreover furnish a favourable

opportunity for entering into negotiations with the Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland to the same end , Trusting that this communication may lead some of those in London who take an active part in Grand Lodge proceedings to consider the matter , and to take such steps as the } ' may deem expedient , I have the honour to remain , yours fraternally , H . PL , P . M . 51 , W . M . 1260 . Jersey , June 13 th , 1863 .

York Freemasons And Freemasons Of York.

YORK FREEMASONS AND FREEMASONS OF YORK .

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE AND MASONIC MIRROTI . DEAR SIR AND BROTHER . —Every one has heard of the Kentish men and the men of Kent , though but few know the difference , and now wo have anew version of the same in the York Freemasons and the Freemasons of York ; but in this latter case the distinction is obvious , as will be shown presently .

In the last number of THE MAGAZINE , page 47 o , there is an account of the consecration of a new Masonic Hall , in York , and the Rev . Bro . J . E . M . Young , Prov . G . Chap ., in his oration on that occasion , brought prominently before his auditors , claims for the Freemasons of York , to be considered as York Masons—two things as widely differing in reality as they are nearly assimilated in sound .

It is not my business to analyse the evidence which could be brought forward to prove that the so-called charter of Athelstan , which the speaker said was granted in the tenth century , and that there was strong reason to believe was in existence at the beginning of the present century , and might be so yet , is nothing more than one of those fond illusions which frequently haunt

Freemasons , and make them assert many incongruous things which , if not actually false , are at the best . 'but doubtful . Freemasonry is decidedly ancient , but in the absence of documentary proof , legendary accounts of its antiquity can serve no good purpose , and tend rather to bring discredit on its pretensions than to enhance its value . That York oriinallwas the seat of the Grand Lodge

g y of all England there is no denying . That the York rite was that most popularly known wherever Freemasonry was practised , is equally true . But that the present Freemasons of York have any special claim to be ranked as York Freemasons , i . e ., brethren of the York rite , is equally unfounded . Before the revival of Freemasonry in Londonin 1717

, , the York rite was the only known Freemasonry in England , and despite the modern Grand Lodge , it flourished under the name of Ancient Masonry , up to the union in 1813 , when such portions of it as suited the Lodge of Reconciliation , was altered and adapted to our present

system of working , and that poz'fcion which did not please , was solemnly declared not to belong to Craft Masonry , and has been , in accordance with this decision , ignored by our Grand Lodge , and though unconnected with blue Freemasonry , yet flourishes vigorously in this country , totally independent of the Grand Lodge of England . In foreign countries the York rite is Freemasonry per

se . It is regarded as the original form of Freemasonry , and from which England alone , of all nations on the earth , the land in which the York rite first had birth , solemnly repudiated it , as a whole , and formed that poor jargon which we now call our Craft ritual from the more copious , elegant , correct , and interesting ritual of the York rite .

If we trace the history of the Grand Lodge of England , from the Grand Mastership of Bro . Payne , at its revival , down to our present M . W . G . M ., the Earl of Zetland , we shall find that every one who has occupied that exalted position , has been a modern Mason , and to show how unfounded are the claims of the Prov . G . Chaplain of North and East Yorkshireto be " remembered we are a

, York lodge , " or that they " may prove worthy of the name of York Masons ; " it is evidenced by the fact that the M . W . G . M . is , as well as being head of the Craft , the Prov . G . M . of North aud East Yorkshire , and if he is not a York Freemason as the one , he cannot be as the nth Rt \

These remarks are m no way intended to trench upon the collective , or individual , worthiness of the Freemasons of Yorkshire , but are put forward to show that Freemasons who are natives of , or reside in , Yorkshire , are no more York Freemasons , according to the old acceptance of the term , than a man who is born in a stable is a horse .

For the future , let us have as much enquiry as possible , but no assumption founded merely on the ring of words which in the case of Freemasonry proper , mean a distinct rite , and on the other hand a locality . I am , dear Sir and brother , jours fraternally , A YORK CULDEE FREEMASON . London , June 14 th , 1863 .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 10
  • You're on page11
  • 12
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy