Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Observer
  • March 1, 1857
  • Page 6
  • GRAND LODGE OF EMERGENCY.
Current:

The Masonic Observer, March 1, 1857: Page 6

  • Back to The Masonic Observer, March 1, 1857
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article GRAND LODGE OF EMERGENCY. ← Page 3 of 4 →
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge Of Emergency.

voluntary act , whatever the person's religion ; and it was impossible for Freemasonry or Freemasons to interfere between a man and his minister . If they attempted to do this , they would go against the fundamental principle of the association . Again he entreated the Lodge by no means to attempt to interfere between man and his minister ; because ho believed it would do harm rather than good , inasmuch as , in the present instance , the sufferers had already shown their inability to resist oppression . He trusted therefore the noble Brother would withdraw his motion .

W . Bro . BEACH said—The W . Brother who had just addressed G . L ., appeared to misconceive the purpose of the motion . It was not intended to vilify or abuse the Roman Catholic Church ; it simply regretted the antagonistic position which that church had assumed . ( Bro . Roxburgh ; " No . " ) Surely a refusal of the rites of religion is an antagonistic position , or nothing is antagonistic in this world . For the origin of the feelings which the Roman Catholic Church entertained towards our Order , we must look back to the period of the French Revolution . It was there that a spurious Freemasonry was

introduced , by the Illuminati of Germany , to support the principles of that Revolution , which threatened to subvert all ancient institutions—to sweep away the altar and the throne in one common ruin . Wo must endeavour to disabuse tiiem of these prejudices by drawing rip a short account of some of our principles—embodied they could not be better than in the beautiful words of our ancient charge , " Loyalty to the Sovereign of our native land , and obedience to the laws oF any state which may , for a time , become the place of our residence . "

W . Bro . WEBB must go with the opposition side against the motion . He disapproved as much as any one of bigotry towards Freemasons , and he felt as much as any one the oppression which brother Freemasons elsewhere sustained ; but he was at a loss to see how that bigotry and oppression could be overthrown , or how a contrary feeling towards Masonry would be produced among the Roman Catholic priesthood , by a motion such as that before Grand Lodge , Ho entertained objections towards the motion , because it was always objectionable to discuss any matter , in which the principle ; of religion were mixed up . The fundamental principle , which all Masons were prepared to maintain was , that the doctrines of Christianity were to beheld apart from any discussion ; that was a rule which was never to be broken through . Free-masonry was open to all Creeds , whether

Christian , Roman Catholic , or Jew It held out the hand of friendship to all alike , and it would be unbecoming in them to acknowledge or give countenance to such principles as that sought to be laid down in the first part' of the motion . Now he differed from the second part of the motion , which proposed that the Board of General purposes should prepare a statement of the principles of their society . It was not necessary to prepare such a statement . The principles of Freemasonry were . generally known , they were those of Brotherly Love , Relief , and Truth . It was not by such resolutions as that

before the meeting , that the world was to be convinced of the truth and value of the principles of Freemasonry . Brotherly love was best inculcated by forbearance and toleration to all ; relief to distressed Brethren was best shown by the numerous Charities established by the Craft ; and truth was best manifested , by the fact of their carrying out honestly and impartially the principles they professed . If Masons followed this course , they had nothing to fear ; they might defy hostility ; and the shafts of calumny aimed against them would fall pointless to the ground . ( Cheers . )

XV . Bro . BIN ' CKES would not have risen to lake any part in the discussion , had it not been for some of the observations that had fallen from worshipful Brothers . As to what had been said , about the necessity of steering clear of religious topics , and the assertion , that if we took up the cause of our oppressed fellow-Freemasons in foreign countries , we should be throwing down the gauntlet to all other creeds , —he would in reply remind Grand Lodge , that the motion applied to a specific subject and a particular grievance ; and that therefore it was considered to bo a subjectwith which the

, Grand Lodge of England was competent to deal . It did not matter to them who or what religious sect originated this persecution ; the only question to regard was , whether needless and special persecution took place on a specific ground . Looking at the matter in this point of view , he would say—that whether it was the Jewish , the Roman Catholic , or any other religion , that had taken up an antagonistic position against Freemasonry , was beside the real question . Had their suffering brethren been laboring under disabilities imposed by Jew or Mahometanhe should have counselled them to

, yield . But the Roman Catholic church , by its acts , bad taken itself without the pale of tolerance ; and the oppressions they had inflicted on Roman Catholic Freemasons , in his opinion , called upon all their brother Freemasons , in every part of the world ,. to sympathize with them . Whether they were to adopt the plan of a memorial , or to

draw out a statement of principles—he could not help thinking , that it could not be productive of harm , even if it did no good . He asserted there was a vast amount of ignorance amongst the masses of Roman Catholics , on the subject of Freemasonry . Taking a broad , general view of the question , he thought it would be of advantage to state publicly to the world—without disclosing those secrets , which were locked up in the breast of every Mason—what were the sentiments , the professions , and the motives of Freemasons as a body . There might bo some force in the remark , that we

ought not to interfere against persecutions of Roman Catholics in foreign countries , for that might be interfering with the government of those countries . But then there were instances , even in our own free dominions , where Masons had been subjected to oppression , on account of their adhesion to Freemasonry . He believed that Freemasons had suffered oppression in some " of the West India possessions . An allegation of specific grievances , sustained by Freemasons in Trinidad , had been made ; though conscientiously professing the Roman Catholic religionthey were denied

, the rites of marriage and burial , because they were Freemasons . And was ho to be met by language to the effect , that these things ought not to be stated in Grand Lodge ? Why not stated in Grand Lodge ? why were oppressions , acknowledged to exist , not to be noticed here ? why—when their brethren in foreign Lodges were denied the rites of marriage and burial , because Freemasons—were they to be told that , as a general principle , the Grand Lodge of England would neither act in their behalf , nor yield them sympathy ?

These were questions , he seriously commended to the notice and attention of every member of Grand Lodge : ho asked them to turn it over in their breast , and he hoped they would agree to the principle of the motion , for he really believed , the Roman Catholics were not so well acquainted with the principles of Freemasonry as they might be . The resolution did not aim at any religion in particular . Ho should support the resolution , and he felt it to be his duty to call on themnot to be led away by the eloquence of W

, . Bro . Havers , or specious objections to a motion , so inoffensively framed as not to offend the prejudices of any Brother , whatever might be his religion . \ V . Bro . MASON : —If any Worshipful Brother had attempted to bring under discussion a single dogma of any particular church , he was satisfied that every hand in the Lodge would have been held up

against the resolution . But nothing ol that kind had been attempted —no dogma of any church had been brought under discussion . He admitted they had no right , as Masons , to discuss such questions , but they were not prohibited from entertaining feelings of brotherly love towards their foreign brethren , and doing what they could to soothe their affliction . Whatever might be the creed or the country , he thought it was the duty of Freemasons , if a church placed itself in antagonism with the Craft , to prevent the interference of that power with the proper privileges of Freemasonry . He would not

go into the dogmas of any class , but when a church placed itself in antagonism with Freemasonry , it was their undoubted right to let that church , and all the world , know what the grand principles of Freemasonry were , and he could therefore conceive no possible harm would arise from passing the motion . V . W . Bro . Grand CHAPLAIN Cox : —The Worshipful Brothers who had addressed Grand Lodge , apparently had forgotten that the Church of Rome declared itself infallible , and that it would never rescind any decree it miht have issuedeven though directed

g , against Masonry , because that assumption of infallibility would thereby be impugned . He thought the Worshipful Brother was in error when he said that the principles of Freemasonry wore not known to the Roman Catholic Church . He must distinctly deny that this was so ; the Roman Catholic Church knew and understood what were the principles of Masonry as well as Masons themselves . And it was because they knew these principles intimately that they carried on persecution against Freemasons . If the present resolution was carriedho felt assured it would only be a source of deeper

, persecution to their Roman Catholic brethren . The only course for Grand Lodge , therefore , to take , was , to act as a Worshipful Brother had suggested—to content themselves with expressing sympathy for the oppressions sustained by their brethren . The Roman Catholic priesthood must be permitted to take their own course with respect to Freemasonry ; they would take their course , and without altering their dogmas altogether , it would be impossible to make them change their system . He earnestly asked Grand Lodge not to adopt such a proceeding as would only serve to

increase the principle of persecution . The suffering brother must look for aid where only aid could be obtained—to the Great Architect of the Universe ; and he would again pray the meeting not to carry the motion , feeling satisfied that every Roman Catholic priest knew everything that was connected with the order of Free-

“The Masonic Observer: 1857-03-01, Page 6” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 28 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mob/issues/mob_01031857/page/6/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
Untitled Article 3
Untitled Article 3
Untitled Article 4
GRAND LODGE OF EMERGENCY. Article 4
"ADDRESS TO THE CRAFT, BY A PAST MASTER." Article 8
Untitled Article 10
Untitled Article 10
MEMORIAL FROM THE PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE OF CANADA WEST. Article 10
BRO. THE EARL OF CARNARVON AT BATH. Article 12
A VALENTINE SOMEWHAT OVERDUE. Article 13
"THE MASONIC OBSERVER" TO HIS SHAMELESS LITTLE MUSE. Article 13
Untitled Article 14
Correspondence. Article 14
Untitled Article 15
From the " Canadian Masonic Pioneer." Article 16
Untitled Article 16
Untitled Article 16
"THE EARLY WITHDRAWAL OF THE BENEVOLENT—A LESSON TO SURVIVORS." Article 16
Untitled Article 16
Untitled Article 16
Untitled Article 16
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

7 Articles
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge Of Emergency.

voluntary act , whatever the person's religion ; and it was impossible for Freemasonry or Freemasons to interfere between a man and his minister . If they attempted to do this , they would go against the fundamental principle of the association . Again he entreated the Lodge by no means to attempt to interfere between man and his minister ; because ho believed it would do harm rather than good , inasmuch as , in the present instance , the sufferers had already shown their inability to resist oppression . He trusted therefore the noble Brother would withdraw his motion .

W . Bro . BEACH said—The W . Brother who had just addressed G . L ., appeared to misconceive the purpose of the motion . It was not intended to vilify or abuse the Roman Catholic Church ; it simply regretted the antagonistic position which that church had assumed . ( Bro . Roxburgh ; " No . " ) Surely a refusal of the rites of religion is an antagonistic position , or nothing is antagonistic in this world . For the origin of the feelings which the Roman Catholic Church entertained towards our Order , we must look back to the period of the French Revolution . It was there that a spurious Freemasonry was

introduced , by the Illuminati of Germany , to support the principles of that Revolution , which threatened to subvert all ancient institutions—to sweep away the altar and the throne in one common ruin . Wo must endeavour to disabuse tiiem of these prejudices by drawing rip a short account of some of our principles—embodied they could not be better than in the beautiful words of our ancient charge , " Loyalty to the Sovereign of our native land , and obedience to the laws oF any state which may , for a time , become the place of our residence . "

W . Bro . WEBB must go with the opposition side against the motion . He disapproved as much as any one of bigotry towards Freemasons , and he felt as much as any one the oppression which brother Freemasons elsewhere sustained ; but he was at a loss to see how that bigotry and oppression could be overthrown , or how a contrary feeling towards Masonry would be produced among the Roman Catholic priesthood , by a motion such as that before Grand Lodge , Ho entertained objections towards the motion , because it was always objectionable to discuss any matter , in which the principle ; of religion were mixed up . The fundamental principle , which all Masons were prepared to maintain was , that the doctrines of Christianity were to beheld apart from any discussion ; that was a rule which was never to be broken through . Free-masonry was open to all Creeds , whether

Christian , Roman Catholic , or Jew It held out the hand of friendship to all alike , and it would be unbecoming in them to acknowledge or give countenance to such principles as that sought to be laid down in the first part' of the motion . Now he differed from the second part of the motion , which proposed that the Board of General purposes should prepare a statement of the principles of their society . It was not necessary to prepare such a statement . The principles of Freemasonry were . generally known , they were those of Brotherly Love , Relief , and Truth . It was not by such resolutions as that

before the meeting , that the world was to be convinced of the truth and value of the principles of Freemasonry . Brotherly love was best inculcated by forbearance and toleration to all ; relief to distressed Brethren was best shown by the numerous Charities established by the Craft ; and truth was best manifested , by the fact of their carrying out honestly and impartially the principles they professed . If Masons followed this course , they had nothing to fear ; they might defy hostility ; and the shafts of calumny aimed against them would fall pointless to the ground . ( Cheers . )

XV . Bro . BIN ' CKES would not have risen to lake any part in the discussion , had it not been for some of the observations that had fallen from worshipful Brothers . As to what had been said , about the necessity of steering clear of religious topics , and the assertion , that if we took up the cause of our oppressed fellow-Freemasons in foreign countries , we should be throwing down the gauntlet to all other creeds , —he would in reply remind Grand Lodge , that the motion applied to a specific subject and a particular grievance ; and that therefore it was considered to bo a subjectwith which the

, Grand Lodge of England was competent to deal . It did not matter to them who or what religious sect originated this persecution ; the only question to regard was , whether needless and special persecution took place on a specific ground . Looking at the matter in this point of view , he would say—that whether it was the Jewish , the Roman Catholic , or any other religion , that had taken up an antagonistic position against Freemasonry , was beside the real question . Had their suffering brethren been laboring under disabilities imposed by Jew or Mahometanhe should have counselled them to

, yield . But the Roman Catholic church , by its acts , bad taken itself without the pale of tolerance ; and the oppressions they had inflicted on Roman Catholic Freemasons , in his opinion , called upon all their brother Freemasons , in every part of the world ,. to sympathize with them . Whether they were to adopt the plan of a memorial , or to

draw out a statement of principles—he could not help thinking , that it could not be productive of harm , even if it did no good . He asserted there was a vast amount of ignorance amongst the masses of Roman Catholics , on the subject of Freemasonry . Taking a broad , general view of the question , he thought it would be of advantage to state publicly to the world—without disclosing those secrets , which were locked up in the breast of every Mason—what were the sentiments , the professions , and the motives of Freemasons as a body . There might bo some force in the remark , that we

ought not to interfere against persecutions of Roman Catholics in foreign countries , for that might be interfering with the government of those countries . But then there were instances , even in our own free dominions , where Masons had been subjected to oppression , on account of their adhesion to Freemasonry . He believed that Freemasons had suffered oppression in some " of the West India possessions . An allegation of specific grievances , sustained by Freemasons in Trinidad , had been made ; though conscientiously professing the Roman Catholic religionthey were denied

, the rites of marriage and burial , because they were Freemasons . And was ho to be met by language to the effect , that these things ought not to be stated in Grand Lodge ? Why not stated in Grand Lodge ? why were oppressions , acknowledged to exist , not to be noticed here ? why—when their brethren in foreign Lodges were denied the rites of marriage and burial , because Freemasons—were they to be told that , as a general principle , the Grand Lodge of England would neither act in their behalf , nor yield them sympathy ?

These were questions , he seriously commended to the notice and attention of every member of Grand Lodge : ho asked them to turn it over in their breast , and he hoped they would agree to the principle of the motion , for he really believed , the Roman Catholics were not so well acquainted with the principles of Freemasonry as they might be . The resolution did not aim at any religion in particular . Ho should support the resolution , and he felt it to be his duty to call on themnot to be led away by the eloquence of W

, . Bro . Havers , or specious objections to a motion , so inoffensively framed as not to offend the prejudices of any Brother , whatever might be his religion . \ V . Bro . MASON : —If any Worshipful Brother had attempted to bring under discussion a single dogma of any particular church , he was satisfied that every hand in the Lodge would have been held up

against the resolution . But nothing ol that kind had been attempted —no dogma of any church had been brought under discussion . He admitted they had no right , as Masons , to discuss such questions , but they were not prohibited from entertaining feelings of brotherly love towards their foreign brethren , and doing what they could to soothe their affliction . Whatever might be the creed or the country , he thought it was the duty of Freemasons , if a church placed itself in antagonism with the Craft , to prevent the interference of that power with the proper privileges of Freemasonry . He would not

go into the dogmas of any class , but when a church placed itself in antagonism with Freemasonry , it was their undoubted right to let that church , and all the world , know what the grand principles of Freemasonry were , and he could therefore conceive no possible harm would arise from passing the motion . V . W . Bro . Grand CHAPLAIN Cox : —The Worshipful Brothers who had addressed Grand Lodge , apparently had forgotten that the Church of Rome declared itself infallible , and that it would never rescind any decree it miht have issuedeven though directed

g , against Masonry , because that assumption of infallibility would thereby be impugned . He thought the Worshipful Brother was in error when he said that the principles of Freemasonry wore not known to the Roman Catholic Church . He must distinctly deny that this was so ; the Roman Catholic Church knew and understood what were the principles of Masonry as well as Masons themselves . And it was because they knew these principles intimately that they carried on persecution against Freemasons . If the present resolution was carriedho felt assured it would only be a source of deeper

, persecution to their Roman Catholic brethren . The only course for Grand Lodge , therefore , to take , was , to act as a Worshipful Brother had suggested—to content themselves with expressing sympathy for the oppressions sustained by their brethren . The Roman Catholic priesthood must be permitted to take their own course with respect to Freemasonry ; they would take their course , and without altering their dogmas altogether , it would be impossible to make them change their system . He earnestly asked Grand Lodge not to adopt such a proceeding as would only serve to

increase the principle of persecution . The suffering brother must look for aid where only aid could be obtained—to the Great Architect of the Universe ; and he would again pray the meeting not to carry the motion , feeling satisfied that every Roman Catholic priest knew everything that was connected with the order of Free-

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 5
  • You're on page6
  • 7
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy